PRESSURES MEASURED BY MARS PATHFINDER

Home Page + Blog Site Contents TV Interview 9/3/2017 10/5/2016 TV Interview Radio Interview Report Contents &Section Links MSL Ultraviolet MSL Yr 3 Fall Data MSL Year 3 Summer Data MSL Year 3 Spring Data MSL Yr 2-3 Winter Data MSL Yr 2 Fall Data MSL Yr 2 Summer Data MSL Weather Year 2 MSL Weather Year 1 155-Mile high Mars Plume March 25 2017 Plume Sol 370, 1160,1161, 1300&1301 pressure anomalies MSL Hi Air & Ground Temps MSL Low Temps Warm winter ground temps & life RUNNING WATER ON MARS Report Abstract to 1.2 Report Sec.2-2.1 Report Sec.2.2-2.4 Report 2.5-2.5.2 Report 2.5.3-2.7 Report 3-4.1.2 Report 5 to 6 Report 7-7.2.1 Report 8 Report 9 Report 10-11 Report 12-12.2 Report 12.3-12.5 Report 12.6 Report 13-14 Report 14.1 Report 14.2-14.3 Report 14.4-14.6.2 Report 14.6.3-4 Report 15-19 Report Afterword Report 20 Annex Links Report figure links Diurnal air temp. variation Oxygen&Trees on Mars? Beagle 2 found Adiabatics Concession by Ashima Old MSL Weather 1 Old MSL Weather 2 High and low pressures normalized Soil 2% water MSL Temp. ∆ Mast to Ground Relative humidity Mars sky color Tavis Sensor Suspicion Vailsala Sensor: Phoenix&MSL Mars Temps Fahrenheit Pathfinder pressures Wind Booms & Disinformation Ingersoll Debate Daylight-math-fix Curiosity Geology Early MSL Weather Reports Landing altitudes Mars Mission History & Sites Nuc on Mars? Aldrin's Phobos monolith Ashima/MIT GCM Critique NASA alters temp. data Viking pressure sensors failed Dust Storm Nonsense JPL Press Conference Critique 1 Navigating Mars Phobos Grunt Failure Moving sand & Mars winds Moving rock Data Fudge Fossil found on Mars? Organic Chem found on Mars MSL Sol 200 Anomaly Gil Levin & Labeled Release - Part 1 Levin & Labeled Release - Pt. 2 - Roswell Link Brine on Mars Lights on Ceres Yr 1 Table 1 Spherical life on Mars? Full Report Contents Scale heights REMS flaws MSL Daylength &Temp Missing data ExoMars crash Desai & EDL Sea at Utopia Planitia Mars Mars winter vs. summer temps Rebuttal of REMS Report Unrealistic Ground Low Temps Mt. Sharp pressures & scale height Opacity at MSL

Pathfinder Data is Best Compared to Viking 1 Data (Updated 5/24/2016)

Pathfinder Data is Best Compared to Viking 1 Data

Mars Pathfinder landing Data:

Landing Date: July 4, 1997.         Date Operations Terminated: September 27, 1996

Martian Month: 5 (summer)         Martian Month terminated:7 (fall)

Ls at landing: 142.7                    Ls at termination: 188.4

Martian Sol at landing: 304.         Martian Sol at termination: 387

Altitude of MPF: -3.682 km.

Comparative altitudes of other landers with MET capability:

Viking 1: -3.627 km (most similar to Pathfinder). Based on scale height calculations, at a time when pressure at areoid is 6.1 mbar, pressure at Viking 1 would be expected to be about 8.5345 mbar and at Pathfinder it would be about 8.5781 mbar.

Viking 2: -4.505 km

Phoenix: -4.126 km

This page addresses Pathfinder pressure data published at:

 

The Mars Pathfinder Atmospheric Structure Investigation/Meteorology (ASI/MET) Experiment

Science 5 December 1997:
Vol. 278 no. 5344 pp. 1752-1758
DOI: 10.1126/science.278.5344.1752

The relevent pressure text and figures from the above article are include below. This author's comments are added in red.

Pressure data. During sols 1 through 30 (Roffman note: Martian sols 304 to 333; Ls 142.7 to 158) surface pressure at the landing site underwent substantial daily variations of 0.2 to 0.3 mbar, which were associated primarily with the large thermal tides in the thin martian atmosphere (11) (Fig.3A). Daily pressure cycles were characterized by a strong semidiurnal oscillation, with two minima and two maxima per sol, together with diurnal and higher-order components, although there was considerable day-to-day variability (Fig. 3B). The presence of a large semidiurnal tidal oscillation is indicative of atmospheric dustiness over broad regions of Mars and over an altitude range of at least 10 to 20 km (19).

 
Figure 3 A.  Time-averaged surface pressures measured by the MET instrument over the first 30 sols of the Pathfinder landed mission. The averages are primarily over the 3-min default measurement sessions, of which there are nominally 51 per sol; and the resulting points have been connected with straight lines, except for sols 12 through 15, where cubic spline interpolation has been used to fill data gaps of about 8 hours in length. MET operation was restricted to nighttime observations during this period to prevent spacecraft resets associated with MET data collection. The major gaps in the data set at sols 1, 8, 11, and 17 (Roffman note: Mars sols 304, 311, 314 and 320) are caused by various spacecraft software reset and downlink problems. After sol 17, the reset problems associated with MET were corrected, and continuous sampling was resumed. The long-term trend in pressure is represented by a third-order polynomial fit to the data (solid curve).
 
       Roffman note: During these days, pressures at Viking 1 varied from 6.51 mbar to 7.11 mbar between Ls 142.7 and Ls 154.017, however there is no Viking data posted for the period from then through Ls 158 so a full comparison is not possible. The pressure of 7.11 mbar is about 0.25 mbar higher than what was seen by the Pathfinder. See right columns on pages D-5 to D-27 of Annex D to our report for the corresponding Viking data. Again, because Viking 1 was about 55 meters higher than Pathfinder, the pressures that it saw should have been slightly lower than what was recorded by Pathfinder.
 
     Another major problem here is that beyond the data that is totally missing for Viking 1 from its sols 117 through 133 (Mars sols 325 through 341), for at least 112 basically hourly (59-minute) time bins which is equal to another 4+ Martian days, the pressure readings were stuck for at least 4 time-bins. About 81 of the time bins saw pressure changes in the range of or greater than the 0.088 mbar resolution amount limited by digitization (see Section 2.6.2 of our Basic Report - which is included at the end of this article). This was a bit less than 16% of the recorded pressure changes. 
 
Schofield et al. (1997)67 indicate that Pathfinder had no pressure data for the most crucial sol – its first operational day on Mars. The reason given by the above reference is there were “various spacecraft software reset and downlink problems.”

       Figure 3B shows diurnal pressure cycles for sols 9 (solid line) and 19 (dashed line), illustrating the observed day-to-day changes in the diurnal pressure cycle and allowing details of the daily pressure variation to be seen more clearly.

       A long-term trend in daily mean pressure was also seen. A third-order polynomial fit to the data shows that mean pressure fell slowly at the beginning of the period and rose at the end, with a minimum just under 6.7 mbar near sol 20 (L s ∼ 153°) (Fig. 3A). This time corresponds to the annual deep minimum in the seasonal pressure cycle associated with CO2 condensation and sublimation in the polar regions of Mars and was seen previously by the Viking landers (11).

       The ASI/MET pressure sensor detected a variety of pressure variations on relatively short time scales. These ranged from seconds to hours and had magnitudes of 1 to 50 μbar. The shorter time-scale variations (<10 to 15 min) appear to be correlated with wind and temperature fluctuations and tend to be largest during late morning and early afternoon, when the boundary layer is most turbulent. The most dramatic pressure features were minima of 10 to 50 μbar, usually less than a minute in duration, associated with vortices (dust devils) passing over the lander. A particularly good example was seen during the continuous sampling of sol 25.

EXTRACT FROM MARS CORRECT: CRITIQUE OF ALL NASA MARS WEATHER DATA (May 24, 2016 update). This information is included here because it was referred to above and because it's location in our Basic Reports sometimes shifts:

2.6.1. The issue of Viking pressure reports and digitization.

        Professor Tillman sent us a slide that showed that Viking surface pressure measurement and resolution were limited by digitization to 0.088 mbar (0.088 mbar = 1 DN (A-D Converter, 8 bits).  An audit showed 0.09 mbar was the most common change for VL-2 on its sols 1 to 199. Between its landing in the summer on its sol 1 at Ls 118 and the end of the summer at Ls 180, there were 4,476 pressures recorded between a low of 7.38 mbar and a high of 8.96 mbar. About 78.57% were either no pressure at all or one of 19 specific pressures, usually 0.09 mbar apart (see Table 4B). The remaining 27.26% were apparently the result of interpolation and/or the cubic-spline technique. 21.64% were exactly 7.47 mbar.

       Balme and Greeley report diurnal pressure variations observed by Tavis transducers showed the maximum pressures were at midnight and 1000 for Viking and Pathfinder.12 Minimums were at 0400.  Phoenix (with no RTG heater) showed no midnight or night pressure maximum. Its maximum pressures were at 0830 and 1530 local time (Taylor et al.).32 For MSL the initial max pressure was about 0730 and minimum pressure was around 1600. So once the transducer type was altered there was no agreement about diurnal pressure cycles.

 

SPECIFIC REPORTED VL2 PRESSURE BETWEEN LANDING AT LS 118 and LS 180 (START OF FALL)

NUMBER OF TIMES

REPORTED OUT OF

4,476 PRESSURES

RECORDED

0

246

7.38

305

                                  7.47

969

7.56

542

7.64

378

7.73

263

7.82

101

7.91

59

7.99

39

8.08

74

8.17

79

8.26

84

8.35

48

8.43

59

8.52

38

8.61

37

8.7

133

8.79

0

8.88

38

8.96

25

TOTAL TIMES REPORTED

3,517

% OF 4,476 PRESSURES

78.57%

INTERPOLATED VALUES

959

% INTERPOLATED

27.26%

Table 4B – Digitization limitations and the specific pressures reported by VL-2 for its first summer on Mars.